Docs
Use case

Review a thesis with an AI client

Use Prism context to ask an AI client what changed, which claims need review, and where the thesis may be drifting.

Prism keeps the thesis file, source history, and research activity in one place. The AI client can help review what changed without becoming the system of record.

Workflow

Primary steps

  1. 1Retrieve company thesis context, claims, reviews, and recent source activity.
  2. 2Ask the AI client to separate evidence updates from interpretation.
  3. 3Save proposals or review cards in Prism only when write tools are enabled.

Useful review questions

What has changed since the last thesis review?

Which claims are best supported by current sources, and which need more evidence?

What risks, catalysts, or open questions should I review in Prism?

Write boundary

When thesis proposal tools are enabled and authorized, MCP can create draft review cards or proposed thesis updates for user approval. It should not directly replace the user's saved conviction work without review.