All prompts
Research prompt
Review what changed in a thesis
Compare recent authorized evidence with a saved thesis and surface support, contradictions, and unresolved gaps.
Copy the prompt
Replace the double-braced variables with your own context.
Review the saved thesis for {{company}} using relevant authorized Prism evidence. Show what strengthened, weakened, or contradicted the thesis since {{since}}, cite the supporting source chunks, identify claims that need review, and keep any proposed revision separate from the current saved thesis.
{{company}}{{since}}Before you start
- A saved thesis and identifiable company context are available.
- The connected client has read access to the relevant Project evidence.
Use this when
You are preparing a conviction review after new results, filings, or other meaningful evidence.
Expected output
- A change-focused thesis review.
- Supported, challenged, and unresolved claims.
- A reviewable proposal with no automatic thesis replacement.